- Prime Notes Newsletter
- Posts
- Ted Hughes’s Use of Animals in His Poetry
Ted Hughes’s Use of Animals in His Poetry
Ted Hughes (1930–1998), one of the most influential poets of the 20th century, is known for his visceral, elemental poetry and for his frequent and profound use of animals as central poetic devices.
Hughes’s animals are never mere symbols or decorative motifs. Instead, they are powerful presences—intense, primal, violent, innocent, instinctive, and often more real than the human figures in his poems.
His deep interest in animals reflects a larger metaphysical inquiry: a desire to explore human identity, power, violence, nature, and death through a raw, pre-civilized lens.
Below is a detailed exploration of how Hughes employs animals in some of his key poems, along with an analysis of their function and significance.
1. The Animal as Pure Instinct – “Hawk Roosting”
One of the most frequently discussed of Hughes’s animal poems, Hawk Roosting offers a close look at the mind of a hawk perched high in a tree. The hawk speaks in the first person, projecting an image of raw power, control, and self-sufficiency.
The hawk sees itself as the center of existence, indifferent to any notion of morality or social responsibility. This is not an animal described by a human, but a voice of nature unmediated by human ethics.
The hawk’s sense of dominion is absolute. Its precision, physicality, and ruthlessness are portrayed without apology. It sees killing not as violence but as a natural extension of its being.
Hughes uses this perspective to critique human arrogance, imperialism, and the illusion of control. The hawk embodies the brutal clarity of nature—there is no remorse, only survival.
The animal is not metaphorical in a simple sense; it is used to question anthropocentric worldviews. The hawk becomes an anti-heroic figure that challenges the human tendency to romanticize nature or place ourselves at its center.
2. Animal as Alien Other – “Jaguar” and “Second Glance at a Jaguar”
In The Jaguar, Hughes writes from the viewpoint of a spectator at a zoo. All the animals—except one—are listless, caged, and pacified. Only the jaguar remains wild in spirit.
Its energy is electric and menacing. Its mind is not trapped by its physical confinement; it paces with untamed force. The poem contrasts the deadness of domesticated or institutionalized existence with the living dynamism of wild nature.
In Second Glance at a Jaguar, written later, Hughes deepens this meditation. The jaguar is not just alive—it is a being of mythic proportion, not a zoological specimen but a force from beyond the visible world.
The creature is described in a way that blurs the boundary between the animal and some pre-human or superhuman entity.
Both poems demonstrate Hughes’s fascination with animals as beings ungoverned by reason or language.
They represent a power that resists domestication and defies intellectual understanding. The animal, in this context, is a figure of primal energy that civilization attempts, but fails, to suppress.
3. Animals as Psychological Mirror – “The Thought-Fox”
In The Thought-Fox, Hughes uses the image of a fox entering the poet’s consciousness as a metaphor for the arrival of poetic inspiration. Here, the animal is not external—it becomes a psychological presence.
The poem depicts a solitary poet in the dark, waiting for a creative impulse. The fox, quiet and precise, materializes through the darkness, its movement mirroring the emergence of an idea.
Unlike the hawk or jaguar, this fox is not violent or assertive, but it is no less powerful. Its paws leave marks in the snow—just as the idea leaves its imprint on the page.
The use of the animal becomes a mechanism to understand and express inner mental processes.
The animal here is not a threat but a guide, a spirit of the wild that offers entry into the unconscious. The poet does not command it; rather, he waits for its arrival.
This positions the animal as an agent of creativity, highlighting Hughes’s belief that poetry is a natural, even shamanistic act, rooted in something deeper than rational thought.
4. Predation and the Cycle of Life – “Pike”
In Pike, Hughes focuses on the beauty and terror of a fish that is both exquisite and deadly. The pike is described in all its sharp physicality—its teeth, its eyes, its stillness.
The poem moves from admiration to fear as the poet recalls fishing for pike in a pond, aware of their stealth and violence.
What’s remarkable is how Hughes insists on the ambivalence of natural life. The pike is not evil; it simply is. Its perfection lies in its evolutionary purpose—to survive and kill.
The fish is a living contradiction: peaceful in appearance, murderous in function. This paradox is not resolved; instead, it becomes the source of awe.
The poem also introduces the idea of human intrusion into nature’s primal world. The memory of killing or catching pike brings guilt and unease.
Nature is no longer a neutral setting; it is filled with moral discomfort, especially when humans try to dominate it. Animals, therefore, become judges or reminders of lost human integrity.
5. Mythic and Totemic Animals – “Crow” Series
Hughes’s Crow poems mark a radical departure from his earlier work. The animals in this series are not real creatures but totemic, mythic inventions, built from fragments of myth, scripture, and surreal imagination.
The crow is no ordinary bird—it is a creature birthed by a failed god in a disordered world. It is at once comic, grotesque, tragic, and prophetic.
In this series, the animal is not a stand-in for instinct, as in Hawk Roosting, but a symbol of existential bewilderment and endurance.
Crow stumbles through the wreckage of belief systems, trying to make sense of suffering, love, and creation. These poems are darker, more chaotic, and deeply philosophical.
The animal here is used to confront the limits of language, theology, and logic. Crow’s presence makes a mockery of human certainties.
Hughes uses this anti-heroic animal figure to explore the failure of myth and meaning in the modern world. The poetic tone is often ironic, parodic, or apocalyptic.
6. Animals as Emotional or Domestic Presences – “View of a Pig” and Others
While Hughes often uses wild or mythic animals, some of his poems explore more grounded, emotional, or domestic settings.
Given a Pig, the speaker looks at a dead pig, reflecting on its physicality and the blunt finality of death. The animal, lifeless and real, becomes a way to think about mortality and detachment.
This poem lacks the reverence of others. It confronts death without sentiment. The pig is not elevated to a spiritual figure; it is heavy, dumb, and real. And that physical reality becomes a confrontation with human fear of death.
This use of animals to address existential issues—without symbolic distancing—is crucial to Hughes’s method. He rarely anthropomorphizes animals. Instead, he forces the reader to face their ‘otherness’, and through that, to confront truths about human limitations.
7. Broader Themes Through Animal Use
Hughes’s animals allow him to explore a range of major themes:
Violence and survival: animals kill to live, not out of cruelty, reflecting the natural law.
Power and innocence: they are often pure in their motives, unlike humans corrupted by ideology.
Instinct vs. reason: animals follow instinct; humans often suppress theirs, to damaging effect.
Myth and archetype: animals become vessels for mythic stories, embodying forces beyond reason.
Poetry and the unconscious: animals appear as dreams, totems, or spirits guiding the poet into unknown territory.
Conclusion: The Animal as Poetic Conduit
In Ted Hughes’s poetry, animals are not accessories to human drama; they are the drama itself. Whether majestic, terrifying, or eerily human-like, Hughes’s animals operate outside the bounds of human morality, speaking from a space of primal truth.
By rejecting sentimentality and refusing to reduce animals to metaphors, Hughes respects their autonomy and acknowledges their power as poetic conduits.
Through them, he crafts a vision of nature and humanity that is unflinching, mythic, and philosophically profound.
To study Hughes’s animals is to enter a poetic world where instinct, violence, and vision converge, and where the poet acts not as a moral teacher but as a witness to the strange, intense realities that lie just beneath the surface of everyday consciousness.